American Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Innovation and Research
E-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
•
Impact Factor: -
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AJAMIR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Design-for-Repair Principles in Consumer Mechanical Products
| Author(s) | Prof. Karin Nilsson |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Consumer mechanical products commonly contain components with markedly different service lives. Bearings, seals, switches, belts, gears, springs, batteries, brushes, cables, handles, and other wear-prone elements may require replacement while the structural body of the product remains technically functional. When these components are inaccessible, permanently bonded, dependent on proprietary tools, or unavailable as spare parts, comparatively minor failures can lead to premature replacement of the complete product. Design for Repair (DfR) addresses this problem by incorporating repairability directly into product architecture. This conceptual–methodological study develops a repair-oriented framework for durable consumer mechanical products based on modularity, target-component accessibility, reversible fastening, standardized tools and interfaces, fault diagnosis, replaceable wear components, reassembly capability, technical documentation, spare-part provision, and safe user or technician intervention. Circular-product research identifies repair and life extension as important strategies for slowing material-resource loops, while empirical work on disassembly demonstrates that access depth, fastener type, tool requirements, and disassembly time materially affect repair feasibility. A scenario-based analysis compares progressively repair-oriented product architectures through simulated disassembly depth, repair time, and reassembly-success indicators. Because no physical consumer product was supplied for teardown or testing, all quantitative values are explicitly illustrative rather than empirical. The analysis indicates that repairability improves most strongly when frequently failing components can be reached through short, nondestructive disassembly sequences and replaced without disturbing unrelated assemblies. The study concludes that technical repairability must be supported by an operational repair ecosystem involving diagnostics, documentation, replacement parts, economically reasonable repair procedures, and predictable reassembly. DfR should therefore be treated not as an end-of-life feature but as a primary mechanical design requirement capable of extending functional product life and preserving embedded material and manufacturing value. |
| Keywords | design for repair, consumer mechanical products, repairability, product longevity, modular design, reversible fastening, design for disassembly, circular product design |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-07-30 |
Share this

E-ISSN XXXX-XXXXCrossRef DOI prefix of AJAMIR is 10.00000/AJAMIR
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.