American Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Innovation and Research
E-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
•
Impact Factor: -
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AJAMIR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Nature-Based Flood Buffers in Informally Developed Settlements
| Author(s) | Dr. Ahmed Rahman |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Informally developed settlements experience disproportionate flood risk because housing expansion frequently occurs ahead of formal drainage provision, land-use regulation, secure tenure arrangements, and coordinated environmental management. Conventional flood-control infrastructure remains necessary in many high-risk locations, yet exclusive dependence on engineered drainage can be financially, spatially, and institutionally difficult in dense low-income settlements. This study develops a simulation-based framework for evaluating nature-based flood buffers as decentralized components of neighborhood-scale flood-risk reduction. The assessment considers bioswales, rain gardens, pocket wetlands, riparian buffers, and hybrid green–gray systems using five criteria: hydraulic attenuation, spatial compatibility, maintenance feasibility, social co-benefits, and tenure-related implementation feasibility. A weighted Flood Buffer Suitability Index is used to compare interventions under standardized hypothetical settlement conditions. The simulation indicates that hybrid green–gray arrangements provide the highest overall suitability score of 77.4, followed by rain gardens at 70.2, riparian buffers at 69.2, pocket wetlands at 68.4, and bioswales at 67.3. Simulated peak-runoff reductions range from 18% for bioswales to 46% for hybrid systems. The findings suggest that nature-based buffers should not be viewed as substitutes for essential drainage infrastructure. Their strongest contribution lies in forming distributed retention, infiltration, conveyance, and ecological-buffer networks that reduce pressure on conventional drainage while providing environmental and social benefits. Successful implementation depends on co-design with residents, protection against displacement, maintenance arrangements, waste-management integration, and adaptation to local land-tenure conditions. The study provides a transferable planning framework for evaluating flood-buffer portfolios before site-specific hydraulic modeling and field implementation. |
| Keywords | nature-based solutions, informal settlements, urban flooding, flood buffers, green infrastructure, climate adaptation, urban resilience, stormwater management |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-09-21 |
Share this

E-ISSN XXXX-XXXXCrossRef DOI prefix of AJAMIR is 10.00000/AJAMIR
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.