Point-of-Care Learning for Allied Health Skill Retention

Cheah Swee Hung

Point-of-Care Learning for Allied Health Skill Retention

Author(s)	Dr. Cheah Swee Hung
Country	United States
Abstract	Allied health practice requires clinicians to retain a broad range of assessment, procedural, communication, clinical-reasoning, and equipment-related skills that may not be used with equal frequency in everyday practice. Competence demonstrated during formal education or a scheduled workshop can subsequently decline when a skill is performed infrequently or when opportunities for corrective feedback disappear. Physiotherapy evidence has demonstrated this retention problem directly: Snodgrass and Odelli reported improvement in lumbar-mobilization performance following objective feedback but also observed rapid deterioration in skill retention. Point-of-care learning offers a potentially useful response because short, highly relevant educational resources can be accessed near the time a clinician needs to perform or reconsider a clinical task. Point-of-care learning is conceptualized as brief, task-specific education positioned sufficiently close to clinical performance to reactivate relevant knowledge, procedural sequences, safety checks, and clinical reasoning. It is distinguished from unrestricted searching for information during care. Effective point-of-care resources should be trustworthy, quickly searchable, concise, clinically relevant, and capable of supporting the immediate question without producing avoidable cognitive burden. Cook and colleagues' study of point-of-care knowledge resources similarly emphasized accessibility, efficient navigation, credibility, and relevance as important characteristics of effective clinical learning resources. Because no original allied health practitioner dataset was supplied, 600 synthetic professional profiles were modeled across three educational pathways: a one-time competency workshop, a point-of-care refresher pathway, and point-of-care refreshers combined with spaced retrieval and deliberate practice. All pathways began with an equivalent simulated performance score of 86. At week 12, retained performance declined to 48 after the one-time workshop, remained at 70 with point-of-care refreshers, and remained at 81 when point-of-care learning was combined with spaced retrieval. These values are methodological illustrations and do not represent real intervention effect sizes.The theoretical model is consistent with broader health-professions education evidence. The paper concludes that point-of-care learning should not replace foundational education or supervised competency assessment. Its strongest role is likely to be as a skill-reactivation layer embedded within a broader retention system incorporating retrieval, repeated practice, feedback, competency reassessment, and escalation when a clinician cannot safely regain proficiency through a brief refresher.
Keywords	point-of-care learning; allied health; skill retention; microlearning; spaced learning; deliberate practice; clinical education; continuing professional development
Field	Engineering
Published In	Volume 4, Issue 5, September-October 2023
Published On	2023-09-26

View / Download PDF File

About AJAMIR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+1-872-302-3851	editor@ajamir.com

American Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Innovation and Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Point-of-Care Learning for Allied Health Skill Retention

Share this