Emotional Recovery After Repeated Workplace Microstressors

Marieke J. de Vries

Emotional Recovery After Repeated Workplace Microstressors

Author(s)	Dr. Marieke J. de Vries
Country	United States
Abstract	Contemporary employees are frequently exposed not only to major occupational crises but also to smaller recurring demands such as interruptions, ambiguous requests, interpersonal friction, digital notifications, minor conflicts, work-process delays, administrative complications, competing priorities, and repeated pressure to respond quickly. Individually, these microstressors may appear relatively manageable. Their psychological importance emerges when they occur repeatedly and leave insufficient opportunities for emotional and cognitive recovery. The present study examines emotional recovery after repeated workplace microstressors by integrating the stressor-detachment perspective, work-recovery research, daily stress models, and recent evidence concerning social and technology-driven workplace stress. Existing research indicates that job stressors can impair psychological detachment, that insufficient detachment is associated with exhaustion and reduced recovery, and that daily stress processes can spill over into subsequent nonwork periods and following workdays. Because no original employee dataset was available, a reproducible synthetic daily-diary sample comprising 220 hypothetical employees observed across ten workdays was generated, producing 2,200 day-level observations. The analytical model included current-day microstressor load, prior-day microstressor load, psychological detachment, leader support for recovery, and the interaction between microstress exposure and detachment. Emotional recovery was operationalized as next-morning restoration of emotional resources on a five-point scale. Cluster-robust regression analysis showed that current-day microstressor exposure was the strongest negative predictor of recovery (standardized β = −.418), while prior-day exposure retained an additional negative association (β = −.096). Psychological detachment was positively associated with emotional recovery (β = .363), and the positive microstress × detachment interaction (β = .185) illustrated a buffering pattern. The simulated model explained 67.4% of variance in next-morning emotional recovery. The paper argues that repeated workplace microstressors deserve attention because occupational strain can develop through accumulation rather than through exceptional events alone. Emotional recovery should therefore be treated as a recurring organizational process supported by manageable demands, credible work–nonwork boundaries, psychological detachment, recovery-supportive leadership, and opportunities to restore affective resources.
Keywords	workplace microstressors; emotional recovery; psychological detachment; daily stress; occupational well-being; work-related rumination; recovery experiences; emotional exhaustion; leader support; workplace stress
Field	Engineering
Published In	Volume 4, Issue 1, January-February 2023
Published On	2023-01-26

View / Download PDF File

About AJAMIR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+1-872-302-3851	editor@ajamir.com

American Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Innovation and Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Emotional Recovery After Repeated Workplace Microstressors

Share this