American Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Innovation and Research
E-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
•
Impact Factor: -
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AJAMIR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Human Factors in Passwordless Authentication Adoption
| Author(s) | Dr. Olivia M. Grant |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Passwordless authentication promises to reduce dependence on reusable passwords while strengthening resistance to phishing, credential stuffing, and password-reuse attacks. Public-key approaches based on FIDO2 and WebAuthn increasingly allow users to authenticate through passkeys, platform authenticators, hardware security keys, device PINs, or locally verified biometrics. Technical strength, however, does not guarantee human adoption. Users must understand what a passkey is, trust where credentials are stored, anticipate what happens when a device is lost, move between devices confidently, interpret biometric prompts correctly, and recover accounts without falling back to insecure processes. Earlier FIDO2 usability research consistently identified device loss, account recovery, setup difficulty, unfamiliar workflows, and misconceptions about biometric data as barriers even when users recognized the security benefits of passwordless authentication. More recent real-world enterprise research continues to identify recovery, hardware compatibility, user guidance, and migration from established password habits as important deployment concerns. The present study develops a human-centered adoption framework for passwordless authentication. A synthetic sample of 600 users was divided among four authentication conditions: password plus time-based one-time password, passkey authentication with minimal onboarding, passkey authentication with explicit recovery guidance, and a fully human-centered passwordless experience integrating staged onboarding, understandable terminology, recovery visibility, multiple authenticator options, accessibility support, and contextual education. he simulated human-centered condition achieved a mean adoption-readiness score of 86.3 compared with 65.4 for minimally explained passkeys and 56.3 for the password-plus-TOTP baseline. First-attempt success reached 97%, while modeled authentication time declined to nine seconds and recovery confidence reached 91. The analysis suggests that passwordless adoption is not primarily a cryptographic problem once strong standards are technically implemented. It is a transition-management problem involving trust, habit, comprehensibility, recovery, device continuity, accessibility, and organizational support. NIST also notes that synced authenticators may support AAL2 subject to applicable requirements but cannot satisfy AAL3 non-exportability requirements. The study concludes that successful passwordless deployment requires organizations to design not only the login event but the complete credential lifecycle, including enrollment, explanation, multi-device use, loss, replacement, recovery, and fallback. |
| Keywords | passwordless authentication, passkeys, FIDO2, WebAuthn, human factors, authentication usability, cybersecurity adoption, account recovery, phishing resistance, digital identity |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 3, Issue 4, July-August 2022 |
| Published On | 2022-08-22 |
Share this

E-ISSN XXXX-XXXXCrossRef DOI prefix of AJAMIR is 10.00000/AJAMIR
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.