American Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Innovation and Research
E-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
•
Impact Factor: -
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AJAMIR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Value-Sensitive Automation for Balancing Efficiency and Human Dignity
| Author(s) | Dr. Amelia Hoffman |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Automation can improve organizational productivity by reducing repetitive work, accelerating information processing, standardizing routine procedures, and supporting more consistent allocation of computational resources. Nevertheless, efficiency-centered automation can also alter human autonomy, occupational discretion, interpersonal recognition, privacy, procedural fairness, and opportunities to challenge consequential decisions. These concerns are particularly significant when automated systems allocate work, assess performance, screen applications, prioritize service recipients, monitor behavior, recommend institutional actions, or mediate access to essential services. International AI-governance frameworks increasingly recognize that technological efficiency should remain compatible with human rights, human dignity, autonomy, fairness, accountability, and human-centered values. UNESCO places human dignity at the core of its Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, while the OECD AI Principles explicitly include dignity and individual autonomy among the values AI actors should respect throughout the system lifecycle. This study develops a Value-Sensitive Dignity-Preserving Automation Framework (VSDAF) that integrates Value Sensitive Design, meaningful human control, procedural fairness, worker and user agency, contestability, proportional monitoring, and socio-technical risk governance. Because no verified organizational deployment dataset was provided, the study adopts an explicitly simulation-based methodological design. Four hypothetical automation configurations are evaluated across operational efficiency, autonomy preservation, dignity protection, procedural fairness, contestability, and meaningful human oversight. The simulated Efficiency–Dignity Balance Index rises from 43 for efficiency-first automation to 92 for dignity-preserving adaptive automation. The study argues that human dignity should not be positioned as an external constraint imposed after optimization. Instead, dignity-related values should influence decisions concerning what is automated, which data are collected, how humans participate, what decisions remain contestable, and how efficiency benefits are distributed. The proposed approach supports automation that removes unnecessary burdens while preserving human judgment, agency, recognition, and accountability. |
| Keywords | value-sensitive automation, human dignity, human-centered AI, meaningful human control, algorithmic management, automation ethics, procedural fairness, responsible AI |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April 2022 |
| Published On | 2022-04-30 |
Share this

E-ISSN XXXX-XXXXCrossRef DOI prefix of AJAMIR is 10.00000/AJAMIR
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.