American Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Innovation and Research
E-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
•
Impact Factor: -
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AJAMIR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Machine-Learning Audit Trails for Reproducible Multidisciplinary Research
| Author(s) | Dr. Daniel K. Morgan |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Machine learning has become integral to multidisciplinary research in health sciences, social science, engineering, environmental studies, computational biology, economics, and other data-intensive fields. Its methodological flexibility creates substantial opportunities for discovery, but it also introduces reproducibility challenges because reported results can depend on dataset versions, preprocessing pipelines, software dependencies, random seeds, hyperparameters, hardware configurations, intermediate transformations, model checkpoints, evaluation scripts, and numerous undocumented analytical decisions. The reproducibility initiative reported by Pineau and colleagues demonstrated the importance of code submission, reproducibility checklists, and structured reporting for strengthening machine-learning research, while FAIR principles extend reproducibility concerns to data, algorithms, tools, and workflows. This paper proposes a machine-learning audit-trail framework for reproducible multidisciplinary research. An audit trail is conceptualized as a chronological, machine-readable provenance record linking source datasets, preprocessing operations, code versions, software environments, model configurations, training runs, evaluation outputs, human decisions, derived artifacts, and publication claims. The framework integrates principles from W3C PROV, FAIR research practices, dataset documentation, model reporting, experiment tracking, and contemporary provenance systems. A conceptual-methodological research design is accompanied by a transparent simulation involving thirty minimal-audit and thirty comprehensive-audit multidisciplinary workflows. The simulated mean reproducibility score increases from 70.43 under minimal audit trails to 87.53 under comprehensive audit trails, while the median rises from 72.5 to 89.5. These values are illustrative rather than empirical measurements. The analysis suggests that reproducibility is strengthened when provenance capture extends beyond source-code availability to include datasets, execution environments, experiment lineage, parameter choices, unsuccessful runs, evaluation procedures, and links between computational artifacts and manuscript claims. The study concludes that audit trails should become persistent research infrastructure rather than retrospective documentation assembled only at publication. |
| Keywords | machine learning, audit trails, reproducibility, research provenance, multidisciplinary research, experiment tracking, data lineage, model versioning, FAIR principles, research integrity |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April 2022 |
| Published On | 2022-04-02 |
Share this

E-ISSN XXXX-XXXXCrossRef DOI prefix of AJAMIR is 10.00000/AJAMIR
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.